赤(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)(song)(song)(song)贊(zan)是父王赤(chi)松(song)(song)(song)(song)(song)德(de)(de)(de)(de)贊(zan)和(he)(he)母后(hou)蔡邦薩梅(mei)朵(duo)準的(de)(de)三個兒子(zi)中的(de)(de)最年(nian)(nian)(nian)幼的(de)(de),關于他的(de)(de)生(sheng)年(nian)(nian)(nian),學者們說法不一(yi)。在《西藏王統(tong)世系明(ming)鑒》中未載他的(de)(de)生(sheng)年(nian)(nian)(nian),只(zhi)說塞(sai)那(nei)累(lei)江允(即(ji)赤(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)(song)(song)(song)贊(zan))五(wu)十五(wu)歲死于火雞年(nian)(nian)(nian)。有的(de)(de)學者指出(chu),若按此記載計算,赤(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)(song)(song)(song)贊(zan)應在牟尼(ni)贊(zan)普(pu)(pu)(pu)(pu)出(chu)生(sheng)的(de)(de)次年(nian)(nian)(nian)即(ji)水兔(tu)年(nian)(nian)(nian)出(chu)生(sheng),而牟尼(ni)贊(zan)普(pu)(pu)(pu)(pu)與赤(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)(song)(song)(song)贊(zan)之間還(huan)有一(yi)個王子(zi)牟茹(ru)贊(zan)普(pu)(pu)(pu)(pu),那(nei)么,赤(chi)松(song)(song)(song)(song)(song)德(de)(de)(de)(de)贊(zan)的(de)(de)王妃梅(mei)朵(duo)準應在生(sheng)下(xia)牟尼(ni)贊(zan)普(pu)(pu)(pu)(pu)的(de)(de)次年(nian)(nian)(nian),生(sheng)下(xia)牟茹(ru)贊(zan)普(pu)(pu)(pu)(pu)和(he)(he)赤(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)(song)(song)(song)贊(zan)二人(ren),而他們二人(ren)又(you)怎么會是孿生(sheng)兄弟呢?
巴(ba)(ba)俄·祖(zu)拉陳瓦所著的(de)(de)(de)《賢(xian)者(zhe)喜宴》中說:“赤(chi)(chi)松(song)(song)德(de)(de)(de)(de)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)和他(ta)的(de)(de)(de)長妃蔡邦薩梅朵準生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)有(you)(you)四子(zi),長子(zi)牟(mou)(mou)赤(chi)(chi)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普早逝,未(wei)建陵墓;二兒子(zi)牟(mou)(mou)尼贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)于(yu)其(qi)父(fu)(fu)三十四歲的(de)(de)(de)水(shui)陽虎年(nian),次年(nian)水(shui)兔年(nian)牟(mou)(mou)笛贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普出生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng),再次年(nian)木龍年(nian)赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)出生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)。”對此(ci),五(wu)(wu)世(shi)達賴(lai)喇(la)(la)嘛所著的(de)(de)(de)《西藏王臣記》中批評說:“蔡邦薩生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)有(you)(you)三子(zi),長子(zi)牟(mou)(mou)尼贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普繼(ji)承其(qi)父(fu)(fu)王位,幼子(zi)牟(mou)(mou)笛贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普塞(sai)(sai)(sai)那(nei)(nei)累(lei)江(jiang)允(yun)(yun)四歲時繼(ji)承其(qi)大(da)哥執政,巴(ba)(ba)俄o祖(zu)拉陳瓦由(you)于(yu)不(bu)懂牟(mou)(mou)赤(chi)(chi)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普與牟(mou)(mou)笛贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普塞(sai)(sai)(sai)那(nei)(nei)累(lei)江(jiang)允(yun)(yun)是(shi)(shi)(shi)同(tong)(tong)一個人的(de)(de)(de)不(bu)同(tong)(tong)名字(zi),才(cai)說出把(ba)牟(mou)(mou)赤(chi)(chi)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普當成(cheng)(cheng)他(ta)們的(de)(de)(de)大(da)哥的(de)(de)(de)淺陋的(de)(de)(de)話來(lai)。”但(dan)是(shi)(shi)(shi),五(wu)(wu)世(shi)達賴(lai)喇(la)(la)嘛不(bu)同(tong)(tong)意把(ba)塞(sai)(sai)(sai)那(nei)(nei)累(lei)江(jiang)允(yun)(yun)和赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)說成(cheng)(cheng)是(shi)(shi)(shi)同(tong)(tong)一個人的(de)(de)(de)不(bu)同(tong)(tong)名字(zi)的(de)(de)(de)說法(fa),而(er)認為應該叫赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)熱巴(ba)(ba)巾。他(ta)說:“有(you)(you)的(de)(de)(de)史籍(ji)(ji)把(ba)此(ci)王(塞(sai)(sai)(sai)那(nei)(nei)累(lei)江(jiang)允(yun)(yun))的(de)(de)(de)名字(zi)說成(cheng)(cheng)是(shi)(shi)(shi)赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan),這(zhe)是(shi)(shi)(shi)由(you)于(yu)沒有(you)(you)看到赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)熱巴(ba)(ba)巾這(zhe)樣的(de)(de)(de)連稱而(er)發(fa)生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)的(de)(de)(de)錯(cuo)誤”。對五(wu)(wu)世(shi)達賴(lai)喇(la)(la)嘛的(de)(de)(de)這(zhe)一說法(fa),有(you)(you)的(de)(de)(de)學(xue)者(zhe)評論說:“若按你的(de)(de)(de)說法(fa),應把(ba)熱巴(ba)(ba)巾稱為赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan),但(dan)是(shi)(shi)(shi),其(qi)他(ta)的(de)(de)(de)許多史籍(ji)(ji)中把(ba)熱巴(ba)(ba)巾稱為赤(chi)(chi)祖(zu)德(de)(de)(de)(de)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan),而(er)且《賢(xian)者(zhe)喜宴》中收錄的(de)(de)(de)存于(yu)桑耶寺的(de)(de)(de)塞(sai)(sai)(sai)那(nei)(nei)累(lei)時期(qi)的(de)(de)(de)盟誓文(wen)書的(de)(de)(de)抄件中也有(you)(you)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)我(wo)之駕前(qian)等語,從盟誓文(wen)書本身看,清(qing)楚地表明(ming)赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)即(ji)是(shi)(shi)(shi)塞(sai)(sai)(sai)那(nei)(nei)累(lei)江(jiang)允(yun)(yun)。”
薩迦派的(de)貝丹喇嘛索南堅贊(zan)所著的(de)《西藏(zang)王統(tong)世系明鑒》中,在塞(sai)那(nei)累和(he)赤(chi)祖德(de)贊(zan)熱巴巾(jin)兩代贊(zan)普之(zhi)間插入了一(yi)個名(ming)叫丁赤(chi)的(de)贊(zan)普。《布頓佛教(jiao)史(shi)》中把塞(sai)那(nei)累的(de)名(ming)字記成是(shi)赤(chi)德(de)贊(zan),而把赤(chi)德(de)松贊(zan)熱巴巾(jin)算(suan)作是(shi)塞(sai)那(nei)累的(de)兒(er)子。如此不(bu)(bu)同的(de)說(shuo)法,不(bu)(bu)一(yi)而足。
無論如(ru)何(he),學者們(men)(men)對這(zhe)位贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)號提出的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)各種不(bu)(bu)同的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)說法都可能(neng)(neng)(neng)有(you)其政治和歷史方面(mian)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)重要(yao)憑據。但是(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)如(ru)果我們(men)(men)以(yi)(yi)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu)赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)在位時期所刻的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)碑文(wen)中(zhong)數次提到“父王(wang)(wang)天(tian)子(zi)(zi)(zi)赤(chi)(chi)松(song)(song)德(de)(de)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)與天(tian)子(zi)(zi)(zi)赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)”等(deng)語作為(wei)(wei)依據來分(fen)析,可以(yi)(yi)清楚(chu)地看出,牟(mou)笛(di)(di)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu)、塞那累江(jiang)(jiang)允(yun)(yun)、赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)、德(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)、丁赤(chi)(chi)等(deng)名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)稱實(shi)際(ji)上不(bu)(bu)過(guo)是(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu)赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)不(bu)(bu)同名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)字(zi)(zi)而已。《國(guo)王(wang)(wang)遺(yi)教》中(zhong)說:“由(you)(you)阿阇黎起名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)為(wei)(wei)牟(mou)笛(di)(di)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu),由(you)(you)父王(wang)(wang)命名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)為(wei)(wei)赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan),由(you)(you)內相們(men)(men)上尊號為(wei)(wei)江(jiang)(jiang)允(yun)(yun)塞那累,由(you)(you)唐人起名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)為(wei)(wei)牟(mou)茹贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu)”。由(you)(you)此(ci)看來,這(zhe)些(xie)名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)稱是(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)由(you)(you)不(bu)(bu)同的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)人給同一(yi)(yi)(yi)個(ge)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu)起的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)不(bu)(bu)同的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)字(zi)(zi),牟(mou)笛(di)(di)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu)是(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)阿阇黎蓮(lian)花生大(da)師起的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de),赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)是(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)父王(wang)(wang)赤(chi)(chi)松(song)(song)德(de)(de)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)起的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de),塞那累江(jiang)(jiang)允(yun)(yun)是(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)大(da)臣們(men)(men)起的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)。還有(you)一(yi)(yi)(yi)種進(jin)一(yi)(yi)(yi)步的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)說法是(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi),開初大(da)臣們(men)(men)對這(zhe)位年輕的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)王(wang)(wang)子(zi)(zi)(zi)是(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)否(fou)能(neng)(neng)(neng)夠勝任國(guo)王(wang)(wang)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)職務還有(you)一(yi)(yi)(yi)些(xie)懷疑,他(ta)們(men)(men)商議說:“最好(hao)能(neng)(neng)(neng)去考察一(yi)(yi)(yi)下王(wang)(wang)子(zi)(zi)(zi)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)威儀如(ru)何(he)。”結果當大(da)臣們(men)(men)前去試探時發現這(zhe)位王(wang)(wang)子(zi)(zi)(zi)儀態威嚴(yan),有(you)偉人之形,所以(yi)(yi)大(da)臣們(men)(men)給他(ta)起名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)為(wei)(wei)"塞那累江(jiang)(jiang)允(yun)(yun)"(意(yi)即歪脖子(zi)(zi)(zi)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)經過(guo)試探后(hou)發現其儀態很好(hao)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)國(guo)王(wang)(wang))。然而,說牟(mou)茹贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu)是(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)唐人所起的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)字(zi)(zi)則不(bu)(bu)知是(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)何(he)所據而言,在其他(ta)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)史籍中(zhong)說赤(chi)(chi)德(de)(de)松(song)(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)二(er)哥的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)名(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)(ming)字(zi)(zi)叫做牟(mou)茹贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu),因此(ci)《國(guo)王(wang)(wang)遺(yi)教》中(zhong)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)這(zhe)個(ge)記載的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)這(zhe)一(yi)(yi)(yi)點(dian)也可能(neng)(neng)(neng)不(bu)(bu)對。
雖然在(zai)一(yi)些史籍(ji)中(zhong)(zhong)說赤(chi)松(song)德贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)的(de)(de)二(er)兒子叫牟(mou)笛(di)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu),但(dan)是(shi)(shi)實際上赤(chi)松(song)德贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)的(de)(de)二(er)兒子叫牟(mou)茹(ru)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu),而不是(shi)(shi)牟(mou)笛(di)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu)。這方(fang)面最(zui)確(que)切的(de)(de)證據是(shi)(shi)在(zai)伍多諧拉康的(de)(de)碑(bei)文中(zhong)(zhong)有(you)“王兄(xiong)牟(mou)茹(ru)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)”的(de)(de)記載。另(ling)外,雖然在(zai)常(chang)見的(de)(de)史籍(ji)中(zhong)(zhong)往往都說二(er)王子牟(mou)茹(ru)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)普(pu)被那囊家族(zu)的(de)(de)人殺死,所以由三王子赤(chi)德松(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)繼(ji)位,但(dan)是(shi)(shi)這種說法卻(que)不可信(xin),因(yin)為(wei)在(zai)他的(de)(de)弟(di)弟(di)赤(chi)德松(song)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)繼(ji)位執政后(hou)賜給班第(di)娘(niang)·定段增的(de)(de)盟(meng)誓文書中(zhong)(zhong)還記有(you),參加盟(meng)誓的(de)(de)有(you)王兄(xiong)牟(mou)茹(ru)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan),而且諧拉康的(de)(de)石碑(bei)上作為(wei)參加盟(meng)誓者也(ye)刻有(you)牟(mou)茹(ru)贊(zan)(zan)(zan)(zan)的(de)(de)名(ming)字(zi)。
那么(me),到底是怎么(me)回事呢?我們可以這樣認為(wei),在王子牟尼贊(zan)普(pu)被母后毒死后,拉(la)照慣例(li)應(ying)由二兒子牟茹(ru)贊(zan)普(pu)繼(ji)(ji)承王位,但是由于(yu)牟茹(ru)贊(zan)普(pu)在此以前將倫(lun)尚波的(de)兒子伍仁無辜殺害,由大臣桂氏做了“三滿意”的(de)判決,將牟茹(ru)贊(zan)普(pu)流放(fang)到門域去了,所(suo)以未(wei)能(neng)繼(ji)(ji)承王位。而(er)當牟茹(ru)贊(zan)普(pu)九年流放(fang)期滿從邊地(di)返回王宮時,其弟赤(chi)德松贊(zan)早巳繼(ji)(ji)位執政,所(suo)以在赤(chi)德松贊(zan)賜給娘·定(ding)埃增盟誓(shi)文(wen)書時,牟茹(ru)贊(zan)普(pu)以國王近(jin)親的(de)身份(fen)參加了盟誓(shi)。