《泰(tai)(tai)山刻石(shi)(shi)》是刊刻于秦代的一方摩(mo)崖石(shi)(shi)刻,分(fen)為(wei)兩部分(fen),前(qian)半部分(fen)(“始皇刻辭”)刻于秦始皇二(er)十八(ba)年(前(qian)219年),后半部分(fen)(“二(er)世(shi)詔書”)刻于秦二(er)世(shi)元年(前(qian)209年),傳為(wei)李斯撰(zhuan)文并書丹,又(you)稱(cheng)“李斯碑”等,屬小篆書法作品,與《嶧山刻石(shi)(shi)》《瑯琊刻石(shi)(shi)》《會稽刻石(shi)(shi)》合稱(cheng)“秦四山刻石(shi)(shi)”。刻石(shi)(shi)原立于山東(dong)泰(tai)(tai)安市(shi)泰(tai)(tai)山山頂,殘石(shi)(shi)現存(cun)山東(dong)泰(tai)(tai)安市(shi)泰(tai)(tai)山岱(dai)廟(miao)東(dong)御座院內。
《泰山刻(ke)石》的(de)前半(ban)(ban)部(bu)(bu)分敘(xu)述秦始(shi)皇(huang)在(zai)全國范圍內申明法令(ling),充分利用法律來保護剛(gang)剛(gang)建立(li)起來的(de)中(zhong)央集權制封建國家(jia)的(de)各項制度(du)(du),要求臣(chen)民(min)遵循(xun)法制,并告(gao)誡(jie)后代要堅持法家(jia)路(lu)線(xian),永不(bu)(bu)改變;后半(ban)(ban)部(bu)(bu)分則記錄了李(li)斯隨同(tong)秦二世出巡時上(shang)書請求在(zai)秦始(shi)皇(huang)所立(li)刻(ke)石旁刻(ke)詔(zhao)書的(de)情況(kuang)。書法上(shang),其用筆都是逆鋒起筆回鋒收筆,行筆不(bu)(bu)緊不(bu)(bu)慢、不(bu)(bu)偏不(bu)(bu)倚,粗細始(shi)終(zhong)如(ru)一,圓轉中(zhong)裹挾的(de)沉著(zhu)與遒勁(jing);結體上(shang)出現(xian)上(shang)緊下(xia)松的(de)態勢(shi),點畫間相(xiang)對均(jun)衡,有(you)的(de)甚至(zhi)均(jun)衡到近(jin)乎一種原(yuan)始(shi)的(de)“拙”的(de)程度(du)(du),幾(ji)乎絕對對稱,秩序(xu)井然,相(xiang)拱相(xiang)揖。
西面 第二(er)行 皇帝臨立,作制明〔法〕,〔臣(chen)下修(xiu)飭〕。
第三(san)行(xing) 廿〔有(you)〕六年,初并〔天下(xia)〕,〔罔〕不〔賓(bin)服(fu)〕。
第四行 寴
第(di)五行 從臣思(si)跡,本原〔事業〕,〔祗(zhi)誦(song)功(gong)〕德(de)。
第六行 治道運行,者產(chan)得宜,〔皆有(you)法式(shi)〕。
北面 第(di)一行 大義(yi)箸明,陲于后嗣(si),〔順承勿〕革。
第二行 皇帝躬聽,既平天下,不〔懈于治〕。
第三行 夙興(xing)夜寐,建設長利,〔專隆(long)教誨(hui)〕。
東面 第一行 訓經宣達,遠近畢理,咸(xian)〔承圣志〕。
第二行 貴賤分(fen)明,男女體順,慎〔遵職事〕。
第三行(xing) 昭隔內外,靡不清凈,〔施(shi)于〕昆〔嗣〕。
第四(si)行 化及無窮(qiong),遵奉遺(yi)詔(zhao),〔永(yong)承(cheng)垂戒〕。
東(dong)面 第五(wu)行(xing) 皇(huang)帝曰:“金石(shi)刻,盡
第(di)六行(xing) 始皇帝(di)〔所為也〕。〔今襲號〕,〔而(er)〕金石(shi)
南面 第一行 刻辭不稱
第二行 始皇帝,其于久遠(yuan)也,如(ru)后嗣為
第三行(xing) 之者,不稱成功〔盛德〕。”
第四行 丞相臣(chen)斯、臣(chen)去疾、御史夫=臣(chen)〔德〕
第五行(xing) 昧死(si)言:
第(di)六行 “臣請具刻(ke)詔書(shu)金石刻(ke),因明(ming)白
第七行 矣。臣昧死請。”
西面 第一行 制曰:“可。”
(說明(ming):朝向(xiang)、分行(xing)據《金石索·石索一》;文(wen)字(zi)(zi)據明(ming)代(dai)安國所藏一百(bai)六十五(wu)字(zi)(zi)拓本(ben);〔〕表(biao)示(shi)據歷代(dai)著(zhu)錄所補(bu)的缺字(zi)(zi);加粗表(biao)示(shi)現存文(wen)字(zi)(zi);=表(biao)示(shi)合(he)文(wen)。)
《泰山(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)》分(fen)為兩(liang)部分(fen),前(qian)(qian)半(ban)(ban)部分(fen)是秦(qin)始皇(huang)二(er)(er)(er)(er)十(shi)八(ba)年(nian)(前(qian)(qian)219年(nian))所(suo)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke),后半(ban)(ban)部分(fen)是秦(qin)二(er)(er)(er)(er)世(shi)元(yuan)年(nian)(前(qian)(qian)209年(nian))所(suo)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)。秦(qin)始皇(huang)二(er)(er)(er)(er)十(shi)八(ba)年(nian)(前(qian)(qian)219年(nian)),秦(qin)始皇(huang)登(deng)臨泰山(shan)(shan),丞相(xiang)李斯(si)等(deng)為歌頌始皇(huang)統一中國的功績而刊刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)《泰山(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)》(前(qian)(qian)半(ban)(ban)部分(fen))。秦(qin)二(er)(er)(er)(er)世(shi)元(yuan)年(nian)(前(qian)(qian)209年(nian))春(chun)季,秦(qin)二(er)(er)(er)(er)世(shi)為威服海內(nei)而效法秦(qin)始皇(huang)巡(xun)視郡(jun)縣(xian),東巡(xun)碣石(shi)(shi)、會稽等(deng)地。李斯(si)同行,奏請秦(qin)二(er)(er)(er)(er)世(shi)在秦(qin)始皇(huang)所(suo)立刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)旁(pang)上(shang)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)詔書以彰(zhang)顯(xian)先帝成功盛德,于是在《泰山(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)》等(deng)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)上(shang)補刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)詔書并著隨從大臣的姓名(后半(ban)(ban)部分(fen))。
《泰山刻石》用筆(bi)(bi)(bi)精(jing)美(mei),平(ping)穩(wen)流轉,骨(gu)(gu)(gu)肉勻稱(cheng),含(han)蓄(xu)委婉(wan),氣(qi)魄宏大,簡捷明快。與(yu)先秦書(shu)法相(xiang)比,秦小篆行(xing)筆(bi)(bi)(bi)粗細大體相(xiang)同(tong)(tong),橫(heng)平(ping)豎直(zhi),轉折(zhe)處極(ji)為流利飄(piao)逸,無生硬之筆(bi)(bi)(bi)。藏頭護尾,筆(bi)(bi)(bi)筆(bi)(bi)(bi)精(jing)細,一絲不茍,如(ru)錐畫(hua)沙,委婉(wan)含(han)蓄(xu)中自有(you)(you)骨(gu)(gu)(gu)力(li)豐沛之氣(qi)。橫(heng)勢(shi)穩(wen)健,縱勢(shi)豪逸,簡練明快,宏偉壯觀。雖法度嚴謹,但不失威嚴雄(xiong)奇之神采,山岳廟堂之氣(qi)象。以(yi)強勁平(ping)穩(wen)之骨(gu)(gu)(gu)力(li),時出(chu)(chu)飛動流走之生機(ji),恰如(ru)唐(tang)代張懷(huai)瓘在《書(shu)斷》中所說的(de)“畫(hua)如(ru)鐵石,字(zi)(zi)若飛動”,“其(qi)(qi)勢(shi)飛騰,其(qi)(qi)形(xing)端儼”,“作楷書(shu)之祖,為不易之法”。同(tong)(tong)時結體整(zheng)齊劃(hua)一,力(li)求平(ping)正對稱(cheng),橫(heng)密縱疏,端莊(zhuang)雄(xiong)偉,隱隱然(ran)又有(you)(you)秀(xiu)麗之氣(qi)。書(shu)體上(shang),比以(yi)前(qian)的(de)甲(jia)骨(gu)(gu)(gu)文、金文以(yi)至《石鼓文》更為簡煉(lian),規(gui)(gui)范化。其(qi)(qi)一,保留(liu)著象形(xing)文字(zi)(zi)的(de)某些特點,著重(zhong)突出(chu)(chu)圓筆(bi)(bi)(bi)曲線(xian)之美(mei)。其(qi)(qi)二,充分地發揮(hui)了(le)漢字(zi)(zi)特有(you)(you)的(de)美(mei),具有(you)(you)裝(zhuang)飾美(mei)的(de)意味。線(xian)條整(zheng)潔協調,改變(bian)了(le)以(yi)前(qian)繁(fan)雜交錯的(de)形(xing)式,書(shu)寫形(xing)式走向規(gui)(gui)律化。其(qi)(qi)三(san),力(li)求嚴格的(de)平(ping)正對稱(cheng),工整(zheng)精(jing)致,大小相(xiang)仿,面目十分突出(chu)(chu)。其(qi)(qi)四,橫(heng)密縱疏,充分表現了(le)篆書(shu)的(de)形(xing)體特征,使其(qi)(qi)在雄(xiong)偉之中產生一種秀(xiu)麗之氣(qi),婀娜飄(piao)逸。其(qi)(qi)五,分布嚴格,空(kong)間層次以(yi)相(xiang)距的(de)對應關系,示人以(yi)嚴格的(de)規(gui)(gui)則,給人以(yi)美(mei),又示人以(yi)莊(zhuang)嚴。
唐代張懷(huai)瓘:今《泰山(shan)》《嶧山(shan)》《秦望(wang)》等(deng)碑并其遺跡,亦謂傳國之偉寶,百代之法式(shi)。(《書斷中·神品(pin)》)
近代書法(fa)家康有為(wei):今秦(qin)(qin)篆(zhuan)猶存者,有《瑯(lang)琊(ya)刻(ke)石》《泰山刻(ke)石》《會稽刻(ke)石碣》《石門刻(ke)石》,皆李斯(si)所(suo)作,以(yi)為(wei)正體,體并(bing)圓(yuan)長(chang),而秦(qin)(qin)權、秦(qin)(qin)量(liang)即(ji)變方(fang)扁。(《廣藝(yi)舟雙楫·卷二·分變第五》)
近代(dai)文(wen)學家、思想(xiang)家、革命家魯迅:二十(shi)八年,始(shi)皇始(shi)東巡郡縣,群(qun)臣乃相與誦其功德,刻于(yu)金石,以垂后世(shi)。其辭亦李斯所為,今尚有流傳,質而能壯,實漢(han)(han)晉碑銘所從出(chu)也。(《漢(han)(han)文(wen)學史綱要》)
《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》原(yuan)立在(zai)(zai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)東(dong)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)安市泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)山(shan)(shan)(shan)頂(ding)上,大概(gai)在(zai)(zai)《明(ming)去封號碑》左右。北宋(song)大中祥符(fu)(fu)元年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1008年(nian)(nian)(nian)),宋(song)真宗東(dong)封泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan),兗州太守獻上《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》拓本,計有(you)(you)四(si)十(shi)余字。慶歷八(ba)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1048年(nian)(nian)(nian))以前(qian),宋(song)庠出(chu)鎮(zhen)東(dong)平郡時(shi)(shi)(shi)曾派人(ren)到(dao)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)模拓《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》,得(de)四(si)十(shi)八(ba)字。在(zai)(zai)此前(qian)后(hou),歐陽修好友(you)江鄰幾(ji)曾在(zai)(zai)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)頂(ding)上親見(jian)(jian)《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》,并(bing)說:“石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)頑(wan)不(bu)(bu)可鐫(juan)鑿,不(bu)(bu)知(zhi)當時(shi)(shi)(shi)何以刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)之(zhi)也。”大觀(guan)二(er)(er)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1108年(nian)(nian)(nian))春(chun)季和政(zheng)和三年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1113年(nian)(nian)(nian))秋季,劉跂兩次(ci)親至(zhi)(zhi)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan),見(jian)(jian)到(dao)的(de)(de)《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》已經(jing)(jing)埋植土中,高不(bu)(bu)過四(si)五尺,形制(zhi)似方(fang)(fang)而(er)非(fei)方(fang)(fang),已有(you)(you)七(qi)(qi)十(shi)六字毀(hui)缺及(ji)漫滅不(bu)(bu)可見(jian)(jian)。政(zheng)和四(si)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1114年(nian)(nian)(nian)),董逌曾親至(zhi)(zhi)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)考察,發現《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》的(de)(de)南面(mian)為(wei)“二(er)(er)世(shi)詔(zhao)書(shu)”,認為(wei)《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》在(zai)(zai)大中祥符(fu)(fu)元年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1008年(nian)(nian)(nian))前(qian)應曾仆倒過,后(hou)人(ren)于(yu)原(yuan)址(zhi)重立時(shi)(shi)(shi)因三面(mian)文字有(you)(you)摩滅而(er)錯誤地調整(zheng)了(le)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)的(de)(de)朝向(xiang)。蒙古憲宗五年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1255年(nian)(nian)(nian))九月,郝(hao)經(jing)(jing)登(deng)(deng)臨泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan),并(bing)撰《太平頂(ding)讀秦碑》,稱(cheng):“面(mian)陽數字仍可辨”。元代(dai)(dai)至(zhi)(zhi)元二(er)(er)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1265年(nian)(nian)(nian)),杜仁杰在(zai)(zai)《東(dong)平府路宣慰張公登(deng)(deng)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)記》中記錄(lu)了(le)自己登(deng)(deng)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)時(shi)(shi)(shi)所見(jian)(jian)《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》的(de)(de)狀況:“僅得(de)數字,其余漫不(bu)(bu)可識。”明(ming)代(dai)(dai)嘉靖三十(shi)七(qi)(qi)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1558年(nian)(nian)(nian)),王世(shi)貞游泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)時(shi)(shi)(shi),發現《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》已經(jing)(jing)被(bei)遷(qian)移到(dao)碧霞祠西墻外的(de)(de)西公署后(hou)。此后(hou),吳同春(chun)分別于(yu)萬(wan)歷十(shi)一(yi)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1583年(nian)(nian)(nian))、萬(wan)歷十(shi)七(qi)(qi)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1589年(nian)(nian)(nian))兩次(ci)登(deng)(deng)上泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)對(dui)《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》進行考察,為(wei)了(le)徹底(di)弄清刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)的(de)(de)狀況而(er)曾專門(men)請(qing)人(ren)將(jiang)秦刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)從壁間取(qu)出(chu),重新遷(qian)移時(shi)(shi)(shi)為(wei)方(fang)(fang)便安置而(er)“各(ge)加鑿削”,刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)遭到(dao)嚴重破壞。萬(wan)歷二(er)(er)十(shi)七(qi)(qi)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(1599年(nian)(nian)(nian)),謝肇淛(zhi)登(deng)(deng)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)時(shi)(shi)(shi)所見(jian)(jian)《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》的(de)(de)狀況為(wei):“通四(si)行,首二(er)(er)字已刷毀(hui),僅得(de)‘臣斯’以下二(er)(er)十(shi)九字耳。”
之后(hou),《泰(tai)山(shan)刻石(shi)(shi)(shi)》被移(yi)(yi)至(zhi)碧(bi)(bi)(bi)霞祠(ci)(ci)東(dong)廡(wu)。清(qing)代(dai)(dai)(dai)乾隆五年(nian)(nian)(1740年(nian)(nian))六(liu)月,碧(bi)(bi)(bi)霞祠(ci)(ci)毀(hui)于(yu)(yu)(yu)火,《泰(tai)山(shan)刻石(shi)(shi)(shi)》殘石(shi)(shi)(shi)失蹤。對《泰(tai)山(shan)刻石(shi)(shi)(shi)》遷移(yi)(yi)至(zhi)碧(bi)(bi)(bi)霞祠(ci)(ci)東(dong)廡(wu)的(de)時間(jian)及遷移(yi)(yi)人,有以下幾種不同說法:①刊行于(yu)(yu)(yu)清(qing)代(dai)(dai)(dai)乾隆三十九年(nian)(nian)(1774年(nian)(nian))的(de)《〔乾隆〕泰(tai)山(shan)圖志(zhi)》載:石(shi)(shi)(shi)舊在(zai)(zai)岱頂玉(yu)女(nv)(nv)池(chi)(chi)上,雍正(zheng)八年(nian)(nian)(1730年(nian)(nian))郎(lang)中丁皂保(bao)移(yi)(yi)至(zhi)碧(bi)(bi)(bi)霞祠(ci)(ci)東(dong)廡(wu)。②《〔道光〕泰(tai)安縣志(zhi)》等清(qing)代(dai)(dai)(dai)后(hou)期的(de)志(zhi)書及碑(bei)刻均(jun)記載為明代(dai)(dai)(dai)嘉靖年(nian)(nian)間(jian)由北(bei)平(ping)(今北(bei)京)許某于(yu)(yu)(yu)榛莽(mang)中得(de)《泰(tai)山(shan)刻石(shi)(shi)(shi)》殘石(shi)(shi)(shi),存二十九字,恐致湮沒而移(yi)(yi)于(yu)(yu)(yu)碧(bi)(bi)(bi)霞祠(ci)(ci)東(dong)廡(wu)的(de)。但吳同春和謝肇淛于(yu)(yu)(yu)萬歷年(nian)(nian)間(jian)登(deng)泰(tai)山(shan)時看到的(de)《泰(tai)山(shan)刻石(shi)(shi)(shi)》尚在(zai)(zai)玉(yu)女(nv)(nv)池(chi)(chi),故嘉靖年(nian)(nian)間(jian)《泰(tai)山(shan)刻石(shi)(shi)(shi)》移(yi)(yi)入碧(bi)(bi)(bi)霞祠(ci)(ci)的(de)記載有誤。③清(qing)代(dai)(dai)(dai)嚴可均(jun)則稱明代(dai)(dai)(dai)弘治年(nian)(nian)間(jian)按察使僉事灤(luan)河許莊將(jiang)《泰(tai)山(shan)刻石(shi)(shi)(shi)》移(yi)(yi)置玉(yu)女(nv)(nv)池(chi)(chi)上公(gong)所,否定(ding)了“萬歷中,從玉(yu)女(nv)(nv)池(chi)(chi)移(yi)(yi)置碧(bi)(bi)(bi)霞元君廟(miao)。乾隆五年(nian)(nian)廟(miao)災,石(shi)(shi)(shi)毀(hui)于(yu)(yu)(yu)火”的(de)說法。
嘉(jia)(jia)慶十(shi)(shi)九(jiu)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)(1814年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)),汪汝(ru)弼被任(ren)命為泰(tai)(tai)(tai)安(an)(an)知縣,司理(li)徐(xu)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)生(sheng)告(gao)訴他:泰(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)山(shan)(shan)(shan)頂有一(yi)(yi)位(wei)九(jiu)十(shi)(shi)余歲的(de)(de)趙老人(ren)(ren),數十(shi)(shi)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)前在(zai)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)山(shan)(shan)(shan)頂玉女池中(zhong)(zhong)見到(dao)依稀有字(zi)跡的(de)(de)殘(can)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)。嘉(jia)(jia)慶二十(shi)(shi)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)(1815年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)),汪汝(ru)弼委(wei)任(ren)蔣(jiang)因培和柴蘭皋到(dao)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)山(shan)(shan)(shan)頂玉女池搜(sou)(sou)尋(xun)《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》,搜(sou)(sou)得(de)殘(can)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)二塊,存(cun)十(shi)(shi)字(zi)。于(yu)是(shi),汪汝(ru)弼將(jiang)所(suo)得(de)殘(can)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)嵌于(yu)山(shan)(shan)(shan)頂東(dong)岳(yue)廟西(xi)的(de)(de)寶斯亭(ting)(ting)內(nei)(nei)。道光十(shi)(shi)二年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)(1832年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)),東(dong)岳(yue)廟墻坍(tan)塌,寶斯亭(ting)(ting)被亂石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)覆蓋(gai),泰(tai)(tai)(tai)安(an)(an)知縣徐(xu)宗干(gan)(gan)于(yu)瓦礫中(zhong)(zhong)尋(xun)得(de)《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》殘(can)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi),囑咐道人(ren)(ren)劉傳業將(jiang)殘(can)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)移到(dao)山(shan)(shan)(shan)下,嵌置在(zai)岱廟道院(yuan)壁間,并作跋記事情的(de)(de)經過。光緒十(shi)(shi)六年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)(1890年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)),《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》殘(can)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)被盜(dao),縣令毛蜀云大力(li)搜(sou)(sou)索十(shi)(shi)日,得(de)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)于(yu)城(cheng)北關橋下,后(hou)仍置于(yu)岱廟院(yuan)內(nei)(nei)。宣統二年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)(1910年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian))五(wu)月,泰(tai)(tai)(tai)安(an)(an)知縣俞慶瀾(lan)在(zai)岱廟環(huan)詠(yong)(yong)亭(ting)(ting)建(jian)造石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)屋一(yi)(yi)所(suo),將(jiang)《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》殘(can)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)、徐(xu)宗干(gan)(gan)跋語和自己所(suo)寫(xie)的(de)(de)《序(xu)》共三塊刻(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)嵌入(ru)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)屋內(nei)(nei),周圍加(jia)(jia)鐵柵欄保護(hu)。民(min)國十(shi)(shi)九(jiu)年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)(1930年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian)),閻錫(xi)山(shan)(shan)(shan)帶(dai)領的(de)(de)軍隊進入(ru)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)安(an)(an),與軍閥馬鴻逵(kui)帶(dai)領的(de)(de)軍隊混戰,岱廟遭炮(pao)擊(ji),環(huan)詠(yong)(yong)亭(ting)(ting)被毀壞。于(yu)是(shi),《泰(tai)(tai)(tai)山(shan)(shan)(shan)刻(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)》殘(can)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)被栘至東(dong)御座院(yuan)內(nei)(nei),并建(jian)起了(le)(le)磚石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)碑(bei)亭(ting)(ting)加(jia)(jia)以保護(hu)。1979年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian),泰(tai)(tai)(tai)安(an)(an)市人(ren)(ren)民(min)政府重(zhong)新修(xiu)建(jian)了(le)(le)碑(bei)亭(ting)(ting)并加(jia)(jia)上了(le)(le)玻璃框。1987年(nian)(nian)(nian)(nian),泰(tai)(tai)(tai)安(an)(an)市博物館復制秦刻(ke)(ke)石(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)(shi)全文(wen)立(li)于(yu)岱廟后(hou)寢宮。
《泰山刻石》最早(zao)著(zhu)錄(lu)于(yu)(yu)《史記》,隨(sui)后著(zhu)錄(lu)于(yu)(yu)宋代(dai)歐陽修《集古(gu)錄(lu)》、趙明誠《金石錄(lu)》、董逌《廣川書跋》等。