從不同(tong)區(qu)域對比(bi)來(lai)看，在全(quan)國125個城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)綠(lv)(lv)色(se)競爭(zheng)力(li)(li)綜合(he)指數高于(yu)平(ping)(ping)均水平(ping)(ping)的(de)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)中(zhong)，東(dong)部(bu)地區(qu)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)有61個，幾乎占到總數的(de)一半，中(zhong)部(bu)地區(qu)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)有17個，西(xi)部(bu)地區(qu)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)有40個，東(dong)北地區(qu)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)僅有7個；區(qu)域內部(bu)中(zhong)東(dong)部(bu)地區(qu)綠(lv)(lv)色(se)競爭(zheng)力(li)(li)優勢明顯(xian)，中(zhong)部(bu)地區(qu)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)綠(lv)(lv)色(se)競爭(zheng)力(li)(li)較東(dong)部(bu)地區(qu)處于(yu)明顯(xian)劣勢。從不同(tong)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)群(qun)對比(bi)來(lai)看，長江(jiang)三角洲(zhou)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)綠(lv)(lv)色(se)競爭(zheng)力(li)(li)遙(yao)遙(yao)領先，珠(zhu)江(jiang)三角洲(zhou)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)群(qun)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)稍強，京津冀城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)群(qun)中(zhong)的(de)城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)較為落后。其(qi)中(zhong)，呼包鄂榆城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)群(qun)所有測評城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)的(de)平(ping)(ping)均水平(ping)(ping)達到0．2964，遠高于(yu)其(qi)他城(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)群(qun)。

從不同城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)規模對比來看，超大(da)(da)城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)所有(you)測評城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)的平(ping)(ping)(ping)均(jun)水平(ping)(ping)(ping)達到0．3217，遠(yuan)高于(yu)其他地區。特大(da)(da)、大(da)(da)、中(zhong)(zhong)、小城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)的平(ping)(ping)(ping)均(jun)水平(ping)(ping)(ping)分別為0．2969、0．2471、0．2313、0．2377，均(jun)低于(yu)超大(da)(da)城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)水平(ping)(ping)(ping)，其中(zhong)(zhong)中(zhong)(zhong)等城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)和小城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)綠色競爭力(li)指(zhi)數低于(yu)全國平(ping)(ping)(ping)均(jun)水平(ping)(ping)(ping)的0．2434。從不同城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)經濟發展水平(ping)(ping)(ping)對比來看，高收入(ru)城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)遙遙領(ling)先，中(zhong)(zhong)等偏上收入(ru)城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)稍強，中(zhong)(zhong)等偏下(xia)收入(ru)城(cheng)(cheng)市(shi)(shi)(shi)最為落后。