連帶清償責任是什么

連(lian)帶(dai)(dai)清(qing)償責任(ren)(ren)是指(zhi)數人(ren)(ren)債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)者承擔共同(tong)(tong)清(qing)償債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)的法(fa)律(lv)責任(ren)(ren)，也就說(shuo)數人(ren)(ren)負(fu)同(tong)(tong)一(yi)債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)，明示(shi)對于(yu)債(zhai)(zhai)權(quan)(quan)人(ren)(ren)各負(fu)全(quan)(quan)(quan)部給付(fu)之(zhi)責任(ren)(ren)。債(zhai)(zhai)權(quan)(quan)人(ren)(ren)有權(quan)(quan)要求任(ren)(ren)何(he)一(yi)個債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)人(ren)(ren)還(huan)錢(qian)。連(lian)帶(dai)(dai)債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)之(zhi)債(zhai)(zhai)權(quan)(quan)人(ren)(ren)，得對于(yu)債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)人(ren)(ren)中(zhong)之(zhi)一(yi)人(ren)(ren)或(huo)數人(ren)(ren)或(huo)其全(quan)(quan)(quan)體(ti)，同(tong)(tong)時(shi)或(huo)先(xian)後請(qing)求全(quan)(quan)(quan)部或(huo)一(yi)部之(zhi)給付(fu)。連(lian)帶(dai)(dai)債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)未全(quan)(quan)(quan)部履行前，全(quan)(quan)(quan)體(ti)債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)(wu)人(ren)(ren)仍負(fu)連(lian)帶(dai)(dai)責任(ren)(ren)。

根據《擔保(bao)(bao)(bao)法》的(de)有關(guan)規定(ding)(ding)，保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)是指(zhi)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)人(ren)和債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)權人(ren)約定(ding)(ding)，當債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)不履(lv)行債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)時，保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)人(ren)按照約定(ding)(ding)履(lv)行債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)或者承(cheng)(cheng)擔責(ze)(ze)任(ren)(ren)的(de)行為。保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)的(de)方式有一般保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)和連(lian)(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)責(ze)(ze)任(ren)(ren)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)。當事人(ren)在保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)合同(tong)中約定(ding)(ding)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)人(ren)與債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)對(dui)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)承(cheng)(cheng)擔連(lian)(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)責(ze)(ze)任(ren)(ren)的(de)，為連(lian)(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)責(ze)(ze)任(ren)(ren)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)。連(lian)(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)責(ze)(ze)任(ren)(ren)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)的(de)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)在主(zhu)合同(tong)規定(ding)(ding)的(de)債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)履(lv)行期屆滿沒有履(lv)行債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)的(de)，債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)權人(ren)可以要求債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)履(lv)行債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)，也(ye)可以要求保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)人(ren)在其(qi)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)范圍內承(cheng)(cheng)擔保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)責(ze)(ze)任(ren)(ren)。保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)人(ren)承(cheng)(cheng)擔保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)責(ze)(ze)任(ren)(ren)后，有權向債(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)追(zhui)償。此(ci)外(wai)，《民法通(tong)則》第89條、《經濟(ji)合同(tong)法》第15條以及有關(guan)司法解釋對(dui)因保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)而承(cheng)(cheng)擔連(lian)(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)責(ze)(ze)任(ren)(ren)也(ye)作了明確規定(ding)(ding)。

該圖片由注冊用戶"心靈密語"提供，版權聲明反饋

連帶責任擔保債權清償順序

《最高人(ren)民(min)法(fa)(fa)院(yuan)關(guan)(guan)于適(shi)(shi)用(yong)<中(zhong)華人(ren)民(min)共(gong)和(he)國(guo)擔(dan)保(bao)法(fa)(fa)>若干(gan)問題的(de)解(jie)釋》第二十條規定，“連(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)(dai)共(gong)同保(bao)證的(de)保(bao)證人(ren)承擔(dan)保(bao)證責任(ren)后，向(xiang)債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)不能(neng)追(zhui)償(chang)的(de)部分(fen)，由各連(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)(dai)保(bao)證人(ren)按其內(nei)部約(yue)定的(de)比例分(fen)擔(dan)。沒有(you)約(yue)定的(de)，平(ping)均分(fen)擔(dan)”。由此可(ke)見，在連(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)(dai)共(gong)同保(bao)證中(zhong)，其中(zhong)一個連(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)(dai)保(bao)證人(ren)先行向(xiang)債(zhai)(zhai)權人(ren)清(qing)(qing)(qing)償(chang)債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)的(de)，其享有(you)向(xiang)其他責任(ren)人(ren)追(zhui)償(chang)的(de)權利，但(dan)應首(shou)先向(xiang)主債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)追(zhui)償(chang)，如主債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)清(qing)(qing)(qing)償(chang)不能(neng)的(de)，再由其他連(lian)(lian)帶(dai)(dai)(dai)保(bao)證人(ren)在前者不能(neng)清(qing)(qing)(qing)償(chang)的(de)范(fan)圍內(nei)償(chang)付(fu)。《最高人(ren)民(min)法(fa)(fa)院(yuan)關(guan)(guan)于適(shi)(shi)用(yong)中(zhong)華人(ren)民(min)共(gong)和(he)國(guo)擔(dan)保(bao)法(fa)(fa)若干(gan)問題的(de)解(jie)釋理(li)解(jie)與適(shi)(shi)用(yong)》作為法(fa)(fa)官審(shen)判業(ye)務(wu)的(de)重要參(can)考文獻(xian)，也闡(chan)明了(le)這(zhe)一先后順序(xu)。

但是追償順序有先(xian)后(hou)并不代表訴訟需要分開進(jin)行。在實際(ji)糾(jiu)紛(fen)中，已經(jing)清(qing)(qing)償債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)的連(lian)(lian)帶保(bao)證人(ren)可(ke)以(yi)同時起(qi)訴主債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)和其(qi)他連(lian)(lian)帶保(bao)證人(ren)，要求兩者(zhe)分別承擔全(quan)部清(qing)(qing)償責(ze)任和補充清(qing)(qing)償責(ze)任，在執(zhi)行程序中先(xian)以(yi)主債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)的財(cai)產受償；也(ye)可(ke)以(yi)先(xian)起(qi)訴債(zhai)(zhai)務(wu)人(ren)，在對其(qi)財(cai)產執(zhi)行完畢(bi)后(hou)再起(qi)訴連(lian)(lian)帶保(bao)證責(ze)任人(ren)。

但是，后一種做法不可避免的會涉及到訴訟時效的問題，即對主債務人起訴是否會對其他連帶保證人發生訴訟時效中斷的效果。《最高人民法院關于民事案件訴訟時效若干問題的解釋》第十七條只規定了連帶之債中訴訟時效中斷事由的涉他性，而連帶保證人先行清償后，主債務人和其他連帶保證人之間并非連帶責任關系，而是補充責任關系，因此其中一方訴訟時效中斷的事由是否具有涉他性沒有明確的法律依據。

夫妻共同債務離婚時是否具有連帶清償責任

1、連帶責(ze)任是指(zhi)兩個或兩個以上的(de)債(zhai)務(wu)(wu)人分別就共同債(zhai)務(wu)(wu)對債(zhai)權人承擔全部(bu)清償的(de)責(ze)任。連帶責(ze)任制(zhi)度(du)(du)是與債(zhai)務(wu)(wu)人有連帶關系的(de)人承擔債(zhai)務(wu)(wu)責(ze)任的(de)制(zhi)度(du)(du)。

2、婚姻法第四(si)十一條(tiao)規定，離(li)婚時，原為夫妻(qi)共(gong)(gong)(gong)同(tong)生活所(suo)負的債(zhai)務(wu)，應(ying)當共(gong)(gong)(gong)同(tong)償(chang)(chang)還(huan)(huan)。既然(ran)規定夫妻(qi)共(gong)(gong)(gong)同(tong)生活所(suo)負的債(zhai)務(wu)，應(ying)當由夫妻(qi)兩(liang)方(fang)(fang)(fang)共(gong)(gong)(gong)同(tong)償(chang)(chang)還(huan)(huan)，也就(jiu)包(bao)含了(le)夫妻(qi)兩(liang)方(fang)(fang)(fang)中的任何一方(fang)(fang)(fang)都負有(you)清償(chang)(chang)全部債(zhai)務(wu)(共(gong)(gong)(gong)同(tong)債(zhai)務(wu))的義務(wu)，在此不能將共(gong)(gong)(gong)同(tong)償(chang)(chang)還(huan)(huan)僅僅理解為夫妻(qi)兩(liang)方(fang)(fang)(fang)等份償(chang)(chang)還(huan)(huan)。共(gong)(gong)(gong)同(tong)償(chang)(chang)還(huan)(huan)就(jiu)設定了(le)償(chang)(chang)還(huan)(huan)共(gong)(gong)(gong)同(tong)債(zhai)務(wu)是夫妻(qi)兩(liang)方(fang)(fang)(fang)的共(gong)(gong)(gong)同(tong)責任。

3、婚姻法第四十一條同時還規定，共同財產不足清償的，或財產歸各自所有的，由雙方協議清償；協議不成時，由人民法院判決。這就規定了，夫妻共(gong)(gong)同財產(chan)不足以償還共(gong)(gong)同債(zhai)(zhai)務時，夫妻兩方(fang)則(ze)要以各自(zi)的(de)個人財產(chan)清償共(gong)(gong)同債(zhai)(zhai)務，而(er)并(bing)不是規定(ding)對共(gong)(gong)同財產(chan)不足的(de)部分予以免責。這就說(shuo)明夫妻兩方(fang)對共(gong)(gong)同債(zhai)(zhai)務的(de)清償是一種無(wu)限(xian)連帶責任(ren)。