仲裁員的選擇原則
選擇(ze)仲(zhong)裁員應把握三條原則:
1、選擇(ze)熟悉相關(guan)專(zhuan)業知識的(de)仲裁員(yuan)
仲裁員均是仲裁委員會從資深的經濟、法律專業人士中聘任的,因此,仲裁員具備良好的道德素質;但由于仲裁員的職業不同,其熟悉的專業知識也不同。選擇熟悉專業知識的仲裁員組成的仲裁庭仲裁相關專業的案件,更能迅速準確地抓住爭議的焦點,分清是非責任,提出解決爭議的最佳方案,從而提高仲裁效率和質量。如果,當事人選擇專業知識不熟悉的仲裁員,比如選擇建筑方面的仲裁員來審理金融案(an)件,即(ji)使這(zhe)位(wei)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)員(yuan)很(hen)想(xiang)把這(zhe)個案(an)件審理好,但由于缺乏專業(ye)知(zhi)識也往往難以(yi)勝任(ren)。一(yi)旦當事(shi)人(ren)做出選擇某個仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)員(yuan)的書面意思表示后,若沒有仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)員(yuan)應當回避的充分理由,這(zhe)種選擇是不能更(geng)改的,因此,雙方當事(shi)人(ren)在選擇仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)員(yuan)時(shi)應十分慎重。
2、避免選擇(ze)符合(he)法定回(hui)避條件的仲(zhong)裁員
《中華人民(min)共和國仲(zhong)裁法》第三十四條規(gui)定,仲(zhong)裁員有(you)下列情(qing)形之一的,必須回避:
①是本(ben)案當事人(ren)或者當事人(ren)、代理人(ren)的近(jin)親屬;
②與本(ben)案有利害關系;
③與本(ben)案當事人、代理人有其(qi)他關系,可能影響公(gong)正(zheng)仲(zhong)裁的(de);
④私自會見當(dang)事(shi)人(ren)(ren)、代(dai)理(li)人(ren)(ren),或者接受當(dang)事(shi)人(ren)(ren)、代(dai)理(li)人(ren)(ren)的(de)請客送禮的(de)。
由(you)(you)于對(dui)方(fang)當事(shi)人享有(you)對(dui)符(fu)合法律規(gui)定回(hui)避事(shi)由(you)(you)的(de)仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)員申(shen)請回(hui)避的(de)權利(li),若(ruo)由(you)(you)于對(dui)方(fang)當事(shi)人申(shen)請回(hui)避而使整個仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)程序中止,則將延(yan)長仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)的(de)時間,對(dui)雙方(fang)均(jun)有(you)害無益。
3、必(bi)須在規定的(de)時間內選擇仲裁(cai)員(yuan)
各(ge)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)均制訂有(you)(you)各(ge)自(zi)的仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)(gui)(gui)則(ze),仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)(gui)(gui)則(ze)對選(xuan)定(ding)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)的時(shi)間均有(you)(you)限制。仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)在受理案件后,會(hui)向(xiang)雙(shuang)方當事(shi)(shi)人分別發出仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)(gui)(gui)則(ze)和仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)名冊,雙(shuang)方當事(shi)(shi)人必(bi)須在仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)(gui)(gui)則(ze)規(gui)(gui)(gui)定(ding)的期限內(nei)選(xuan)定(ding)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)。根據《中華人民共和國仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)法》第三十二(er)條的規(gui)(gui)(gui)定(ding),當事(shi)(shi)人未在仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)(gui)(gui)則(ze)規(gui)(gui)(gui)定(ding)的有(you)(you)效期內(nei)選(xuan)定(ding)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)(yuan),仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)將視為當事(shi)(shi)人自(zi)動放棄該項(xiang)權利,由仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)委員(yuan)(yuan)會(hui)主(zhu)任指定(ding)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)組(zu)成仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭。
仲裁中的仲裁員與律師有何區別
(1)取(qu)得資格(ge)(ge)的條件不同。仲裁員資格(ge)(ge)的取(qu)得要符合仲裁法第(di)13條的(de)規(gui)定;律師資(zi)格的(de)取(qu)得要通過每年(nian)國家進(jin)行的(de)律師資(zi)格考試。
(2)辦(ban)案(an)的(de)性(xing)(xing)質不(bu)同(tong)。仲裁員辦(ban)案(an)是(shi)公斷性(xing)(xing)質的(de),不(bu)代表任何一方(fang)當(dang)(dang)事人(ren);律師(shi)辦(ban)案(an)是(shi)代理性(xing)(xing)質的(de),代表委托一方(fang)當(dang)(dang)事人(ren)的(de)權益。
(3)仲裁員受(shou)(shou)回避(bi)(bi)制(zhi)度約(yue)束,不能(neng)私(si)自(zi)會見(jian)當事人(ren),也不能(neng)就案(an)情(qing)向當事人(ren)發表任何意見(jian);律師不受(shou)(shou)回避(bi)(bi)制(zhi)度約(yue)束,可(ke)以與自(zi)己(ji)代(dai)理(li)的當事人(ren)商量案(an)情(qing),代(dai)表其權益,為其出(chu)主意想辦法并(bing)出(chu)庭(ting)辯護。
(4)仲(zhong)裁(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)依據仲(zhong)裁(cai)規則(ze),按(an)仲(zhong)裁(cai)程序辦案。當事人(ren)有意(yi)(yi)見(jian)和要求(qiu),應書面通過(guo)該案記錄員(yuan)(yuan)轉(zhuan)遞給仲(zhong)裁(cai)員(yuan)(yuan);律師按(an)當事人(ren)意(yi)(yi)愿(yuan)代理,隨時與當事人(ren)交換意(yi)(yi)見(jian),不需要第三者轉(zhuan)遞。
申請仲裁員回避的條件
根據《仲裁法》第三(san)十四條規定,仲裁員有下列情形(xing)之一的(de),必須回避(bi)(bi),當事人(ren)也有權提出回避(bi)(bi)申請:
(一)是本案當事(shi)人或者當事(shi)人、代(dai)理(li)人的近親屬(shu);
(二)與本案(an)有利害關系(xi);
(三)與本(ben)案當事(shi)人、代理人有其他關系,可能影響公正仲裁的;
(四)私自會見當事人、代理人,或者接受當事人、代理人的請客送禮的。